BLASTP 2.2.12 [Aug-07-2005]
Reference: Altschul, Stephen F., Thomas L. Madden, Alejandro A. Schaffer,
Jinghui Zhang, Zheng Zhang, Webb Miller, and David J. Lipman (1997),
"Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search
programs", Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-3402.
Query= BGIBMGA000898-TA|BGIBMGA000898-PA|undefined
(173 letters)
Database: nematostella
59,808 sequences; 16,821,457 total letters
Searching..................................................done
Score E
Sequences producing significant alignments: (bits) Value
SB_7585| Best HMM Match : HMG_box (HMM E-Value=8.9) 144 4e-35
SB_59749| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 29 2.1
SB_27312| Best HMM Match : Pox_A32 (HMM E-Value=0.012) 29 2.1
SB_15117| Best HMM Match : Pox_A32 (HMM E-Value=0.038) 29 2.1
SB_52815| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 28 4.8
SB_17972| Best HMM Match : RnaseH (HMM E-Value=0.95) 28 4.8
SB_7014| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 28 4.8
SB_3881| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 28 4.8
SB_1260| Best HMM Match : Phage_Coat_Gp8 (HMM E-Value=1.3) 28 4.8
SB_58633| Best HMM Match : Phage_Coat_Gp8 (HMM E-Value=2.8) 28 4.8
SB_52974| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 28 4.8
SB_37846| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 28 4.8
SB_32527| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 28 4.8
SB_5898| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 28 4.8
SB_4563| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 28 4.8
SB_53228| Best HMM Match : CITED (HMM E-Value=2.5) 27 6.4
SB_48415| Best HMM Match : Pox_A32 (HMM E-Value=0.014) 27 6.4
SB_56796| Best HMM Match : CITED (HMM E-Value=1.2) 27 8.4
SB_36409| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 27 8.4
SB_14482| Best HMM Match : Cornifin (HMM E-Value=3.7) 27 8.4
SB_7385| Best HMM Match : DUF1224 (HMM E-Value=5.7) 27 8.4
SB_1330| Best HMM Match : Phage_Coat_Gp8 (HMM E-Value=1.9) 27 8.4
SB_1075| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=0.0089) 27 8.4
SB_24615| Best HMM Match : CSE2 (HMM E-Value=3.1) 27 8.4
SB_9870| Best HMM Match : GspM (HMM E-Value=1.9) 27 8.4
>SB_7585| Best HMM Match : HMG_box (HMM E-Value=8.9)
Length = 125
Score = 144 bits (349), Expect = 4e-35
Identities = 60/82 (73%), Positives = 75/82 (91%), Gaps = 2/82 (2%)
Query: 52 EIAEGVIPRHRFMSAYEQKIEPPDRRWQYLLFAAEPYETIAFKVPSREVEKHDSKFWTHW 111
EIAEGV+PRHRFMSAYEQ+IEPP+++WQYLLFAAEPYETIAFK+PSRE++K + KFWT W
Sbjct: 5 EIAEGVVPRHRFMSAYEQRIEPPNKQWQYLLFAAEPYETIAFKIPSREIDKEEGKFWTQW 64
Query: 112 NKDTKQFFLQFAFKMD--QLRM 131
N+DTKQF++QF F++ QL+M
Sbjct: 65 NRDTKQFYIQFHFRLSPHQLQM 86
>SB_59749| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.)
Length = 1091
Score = 29.1 bits (62), Expect = 2.1
Identities = 12/38 (31%), Positives = 20/38 (52%)
Query: 7 PGGKTGGGGVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNKDP 44
PG G +A W+ +NR ++E LR A + + + P
Sbjct: 838 PGRVEAGRRLAKWNRTNRAKKEALRVAAAQQLPVTPGP 875
>SB_27312| Best HMM Match : Pox_A32 (HMM E-Value=0.012)
Length = 1115
Score = 29.1 bits (62), Expect = 2.1
Identities = 12/38 (31%), Positives = 20/38 (52%)
Query: 7 PGGKTGGGGVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNKDP 44
PG G +A W+ +NR ++E LR A + + + P
Sbjct: 552 PGRVEAGRRLAKWNRTNRAKKEALRVAAAQQLPVTPGP 589
>SB_15117| Best HMM Match : Pox_A32 (HMM E-Value=0.038)
Length = 771
Score = 29.1 bits (62), Expect = 2.1
Identities = 12/38 (31%), Positives = 20/38 (52%)
Query: 7 PGGKTGGGGVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNKDP 44
PG G +A W+ +NR ++E LR A + + + P
Sbjct: 404 PGRVEAGRRLAKWNRTNRAKKEALRVAAAQQLPVTPGP 441
>SB_52815| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.)
Length = 540
Score = 27.9 bits (59), Expect = 4.8
Identities = 10/21 (47%), Positives = 13/21 (61%)
Query: 3 FQNRPGGKTGGGGVASWSESN 23
F++ GG GGGG + WS N
Sbjct: 203 FKSHKGGAGGGGGSSQWSPEN 223
>SB_17972| Best HMM Match : RnaseH (HMM E-Value=0.95)
Length = 186
Score = 27.9 bits (59), Expect = 4.8
Identities = 17/43 (39%), Positives = 24/43 (55%), Gaps = 1/43 (2%)
Query: 34 ALETIDLNKDPYFMKNHLEIAEGVIPR-HRFMSAYEQKIEPPD 75
AL+ I +N +F+KN + IA IPR ++ Y KI PD
Sbjct: 100 ALQNIAVNIFQFFVKNAVNIAMQWIPRKENELADYISKIVDPD 142
>SB_7014| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.)
Length = 509
Score = 27.9 bits (59), Expect = 4.8
Identities = 12/38 (31%), Positives = 19/38 (50%)
Query: 7 PGGKTGGGGVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNKDP 44
PG G +A W+ NR ++E LR A + + + P
Sbjct: 200 PGRVEAGRRLAKWNRINRAKKESLRVAAAQQLPVTPGP 237
>SB_3881| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.)
Length = 368
Score = 27.9 bits (59), Expect = 4.8
Identities = 12/38 (31%), Positives = 20/38 (52%)
Query: 7 PGGKTGGGGVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNKDP 44
PG G +A W+ NR ++E LR A + + + + P
Sbjct: 263 PGQVEAGRRLAKWNRINRAKKETLRVAAAQQLPVAQGP 300
>SB_1260| Best HMM Match : Phage_Coat_Gp8 (HMM E-Value=1.3)
Length = 220
Score = 27.9 bits (59), Expect = 4.8
Identities = 12/38 (31%), Positives = 19/38 (50%)
Query: 7 PGGKTGGGGVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNKDP 44
PG G +A W+ NR ++E LR A + + + P
Sbjct: 60 PGRVEAGRRLAKWNRINRAKKEALRVAAAQQLPVTPGP 97
>SB_58633| Best HMM Match : Phage_Coat_Gp8 (HMM E-Value=2.8)
Length = 599
Score = 27.9 bits (59), Expect = 4.8
Identities = 12/38 (31%), Positives = 19/38 (50%)
Query: 7 PGGKTGGGGVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNKDP 44
PG G +A W+ NR ++E LR A + + + P
Sbjct: 443 PGRVEAGRRLAKWNRINRAKKEALRVAAAQQLPVTPGP 480
>SB_52974| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.)
Length = 660
Score = 27.9 bits (59), Expect = 4.8
Identities = 11/25 (44%), Positives = 15/25 (60%)
Query: 7 PGGKTGGGGVASWSESNRDRRERLR 31
PG GG +A W+ NR ++E LR
Sbjct: 338 PGRVEAGGRLAKWNRINRAKKETLR 362
>SB_37846| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.)
Length = 458
Score = 27.9 bits (59), Expect = 4.8
Identities = 12/38 (31%), Positives = 19/38 (50%)
Query: 7 PGGKTGGGGVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNKDP 44
PG G +A W+ NR ++E LR A + + + P
Sbjct: 302 PGRVEAGRRLAKWNRINRAKKEALRVAAAQQLPVTPGP 339
>SB_32527| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.)
Length = 62
Score = 27.9 bits (59), Expect = 4.8
Identities = 16/40 (40%), Positives = 20/40 (50%), Gaps = 1/40 (2%)
Query: 84 AAEPYETIAFKVPSREVE-KHDSKFWTHWNKDTKQFFLQF 122
A PYE IAFKV +RE E H F + + Q + F
Sbjct: 16 AGPPYEDIAFKVVNREWEYSHRHGFRCQFQNNIFQLWFHF 55
>SB_5898| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.)
Length = 1109
Score = 27.9 bits (59), Expect = 4.8
Identities = 12/38 (31%), Positives = 19/38 (50%)
Query: 7 PGGKTGGGGVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNKDP 44
PG G +A W+ NR ++E LR A + + + P
Sbjct: 799 PGRVEAGRRLAKWNRINRAKKEALRVAAAQQLPVTPGP 836
>SB_4563| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.)
Length = 1473
Score = 27.9 bits (59), Expect = 4.8
Identities = 12/38 (31%), Positives = 19/38 (50%)
Query: 7 PGGKTGGGGVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNKDP 44
PG G +A W+ NR ++E LR A + + + P
Sbjct: 1045 PGRVEAGRRLAKWNRINRAKKEALRVAAAQQLPVTPGP 1082
>SB_53228| Best HMM Match : CITED (HMM E-Value=2.5)
Length = 417
Score = 27.5 bits (58), Expect = 6.4
Identities = 12/38 (31%), Positives = 19/38 (50%)
Query: 7 PGGKTGGGGVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNKDP 44
PG G +A W+ NR ++E LR A + + + P
Sbjct: 186 PGRVEAGRRLAKWNRINRAKKEALRVAAAQQLRVTPGP 223
>SB_48415| Best HMM Match : Pox_A32 (HMM E-Value=0.014)
Length = 988
Score = 27.5 bits (58), Expect = 6.4
Identities = 12/38 (31%), Positives = 19/38 (50%)
Query: 7 PGGKTGGGGVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNKDP 44
PG G +A W+ NR ++E LR A + + + P
Sbjct: 832 PGRVEAGRRLAKWNRINRAKKEALRVAAAQQLPVTLGP 869
>SB_56796| Best HMM Match : CITED (HMM E-Value=1.2)
Length = 431
Score = 27.1 bits (57), Expect = 8.4
Identities = 12/38 (31%), Positives = 19/38 (50%)
Query: 7 PGGKTGGGGVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNKDP 44
PG G +A W+ NR ++E LR A + + + P
Sbjct: 60 PGRVEAGRRLAKWNRINRAKKEVLRVAAAQQLPVTPGP 97
>SB_36409| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.)
Length = 1281
Score = 27.1 bits (57), Expect = 8.4
Identities = 15/40 (37%), Positives = 21/40 (52%), Gaps = 1/40 (2%)
Query: 4 QNRPGGKTGGG-GVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNK 42
+ RPGG V S E NR+ R+ +RQ+ E LN+
Sbjct: 425 KERPGGTAESDPNVTSLQEQNRNLRDVIRQMRREMEGLNE 464
>SB_14482| Best HMM Match : Cornifin (HMM E-Value=3.7)
Length = 301
Score = 27.1 bits (57), Expect = 8.4
Identities = 12/38 (31%), Positives = 19/38 (50%)
Query: 7 PGGKTGGGGVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNKDP 44
PG G +A W+ NR ++E LR A + + + P
Sbjct: 57 PGRVEAGRRLAKWNRINRAKKEVLRVAAAQQLPVTPGP 94
>SB_7385| Best HMM Match : DUF1224 (HMM E-Value=5.7)
Length = 232
Score = 27.1 bits (57), Expect = 8.4
Identities = 21/87 (24%), Positives = 38/87 (43%), Gaps = 2/87 (2%)
Query: 23 NRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNKDPYFMKNHLEIAEGVIPRHRFMSAYEQKIEPPDRRWQYLL 82
+R R+ L+ + ETI L + Y + L+ +P +R M+ + ++ + Y
Sbjct: 128 SRSDRKTLK-IYEETIRLREGHYEVAGPLKDGNPGLPNNRPMAEHRLRLLKKKIKQSYSA 186
Query: 83 FAAEPYETI-AFKVPSREVEKHDSKFW 108
+ A KVP +E+ D K W
Sbjct: 187 SIENLIDKCYAQKVPEEHLEREDGKLW 213
>SB_1330| Best HMM Match : Phage_Coat_Gp8 (HMM E-Value=1.9)
Length = 482
Score = 27.1 bits (57), Expect = 8.4
Identities = 12/38 (31%), Positives = 19/38 (50%)
Query: 7 PGGKTGGGGVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNKDP 44
PG G +A W+ NR ++E LR A + + + P
Sbjct: 126 PGRVEAGRRLAKWNRINRAKKESLRVAAAQQLPVAPGP 163
>SB_1075| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=0.0089)
Length = 1617
Score = 27.1 bits (57), Expect = 8.4
Identities = 12/38 (31%), Positives = 19/38 (50%)
Query: 7 PGGKTGGGGVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNKDP 44
PG G +A W+ NR ++E LR A + + + P
Sbjct: 1148 PGRVEAGRRLAKWNRINRAKKESLRVAAAQQLPVAPGP 1185
>SB_24615| Best HMM Match : CSE2 (HMM E-Value=3.1)
Length = 113
Score = 27.1 bits (57), Expect = 8.4
Identities = 15/40 (37%), Positives = 21/40 (52%), Gaps = 1/40 (2%)
Query: 4 QNRPGGKTGGG-GVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNK 42
+ RPGG V S E NR+ R+ +RQ+ E LN+
Sbjct: 2 KERPGGTAESDPNVTSLQEQNRNLRDVIRQMRREMEGLNE 41
>SB_9870| Best HMM Match : GspM (HMM E-Value=1.9)
Length = 522
Score = 27.1 bits (57), Expect = 8.4
Identities = 12/38 (31%), Positives = 19/38 (50%)
Query: 7 PGGKTGGGGVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNKDP 44
PG G +A W+ NR ++E LR A + + + P
Sbjct: 195 PGRVEAGRRLAKWNRINRAKKEVLRVAAAQQLPVTPGP 232
Database: nematostella
Posted date: Oct 22, 2007 1:22 PM
Number of letters in database: 16,821,457
Number of sequences in database: 59,808
Lambda K H
0.321 0.136 0.439
Gapped
Lambda K H
0.279 0.0580 0.190
Matrix: BLOSUM62
Gap Penalties: Existence: 9, Extension: 2
Number of Hits to DB: 5,803,619
Number of Sequences: 59808
Number of extensions: 229432
Number of successful extensions: 513
Number of sequences better than 10.0: 25
Number of HSP's better than 10.0 without gapping: 20
Number of HSP's successfully gapped in prelim test: 5
Number of HSP's that attempted gapping in prelim test: 493
Number of HSP's gapped (non-prelim): 25
length of query: 173
length of database: 16,821,457
effective HSP length: 77
effective length of query: 96
effective length of database: 12,216,241
effective search space: 1172759136
effective search space used: 1172759136
T: 11
A: 40
X1: 16 ( 7.4 bits)
X2: 37 (14.9 bits)
X3: 62 (25.0 bits)
S1: 41 (21.9 bits)
S2: 57 (27.1 bits)
- SilkBase 1999-2023 -