BLASTP 2.2.12 [Aug-07-2005] Reference: Altschul, Stephen F., Thomas L. Madden, Alejandro A. Schaffer, Jinghui Zhang, Zheng Zhang, Webb Miller, and David J. Lipman (1997), "Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs", Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-3402. Query= BGIBMGA000898-TA|BGIBMGA000898-PA|undefined (173 letters) Database: nematostella 59,808 sequences; 16,821,457 total letters Searching..................................................done Score E Sequences producing significant alignments: (bits) Value SB_7585| Best HMM Match : HMG_box (HMM E-Value=8.9) 144 4e-35 SB_59749| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 29 2.1 SB_27312| Best HMM Match : Pox_A32 (HMM E-Value=0.012) 29 2.1 SB_15117| Best HMM Match : Pox_A32 (HMM E-Value=0.038) 29 2.1 SB_52815| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 28 4.8 SB_17972| Best HMM Match : RnaseH (HMM E-Value=0.95) 28 4.8 SB_7014| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 28 4.8 SB_3881| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 28 4.8 SB_1260| Best HMM Match : Phage_Coat_Gp8 (HMM E-Value=1.3) 28 4.8 SB_58633| Best HMM Match : Phage_Coat_Gp8 (HMM E-Value=2.8) 28 4.8 SB_52974| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 28 4.8 SB_37846| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 28 4.8 SB_32527| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 28 4.8 SB_5898| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 28 4.8 SB_4563| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 28 4.8 SB_53228| Best HMM Match : CITED (HMM E-Value=2.5) 27 6.4 SB_48415| Best HMM Match : Pox_A32 (HMM E-Value=0.014) 27 6.4 SB_56796| Best HMM Match : CITED (HMM E-Value=1.2) 27 8.4 SB_36409| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 27 8.4 SB_14482| Best HMM Match : Cornifin (HMM E-Value=3.7) 27 8.4 SB_7385| Best HMM Match : DUF1224 (HMM E-Value=5.7) 27 8.4 SB_1330| Best HMM Match : Phage_Coat_Gp8 (HMM E-Value=1.9) 27 8.4 SB_1075| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=0.0089) 27 8.4 SB_24615| Best HMM Match : CSE2 (HMM E-Value=3.1) 27 8.4 SB_9870| Best HMM Match : GspM (HMM E-Value=1.9) 27 8.4 >SB_7585| Best HMM Match : HMG_box (HMM E-Value=8.9) Length = 125 Score = 144 bits (349), Expect = 4e-35 Identities = 60/82 (73%), Positives = 75/82 (91%), Gaps = 2/82 (2%) Query: 52 EIAEGVIPRHRFMSAYEQKIEPPDRRWQYLLFAAEPYETIAFKVPSREVEKHDSKFWTHW 111 EIAEGV+PRHRFMSAYEQ+IEPP+++WQYLLFAAEPYETIAFK+PSRE++K + KFWT W Sbjct: 5 EIAEGVVPRHRFMSAYEQRIEPPNKQWQYLLFAAEPYETIAFKIPSREIDKEEGKFWTQW 64 Query: 112 NKDTKQFFLQFAFKMD--QLRM 131 N+DTKQF++QF F++ QL+M Sbjct: 65 NRDTKQFYIQFHFRLSPHQLQM 86 >SB_59749| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) Length = 1091 Score = 29.1 bits (62), Expect = 2.1 Identities = 12/38 (31%), Positives = 20/38 (52%) Query: 7 PGGKTGGGGVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNKDP 44 PG G +A W+ +NR ++E LR A + + + P Sbjct: 838 PGRVEAGRRLAKWNRTNRAKKEALRVAAAQQLPVTPGP 875 >SB_27312| Best HMM Match : Pox_A32 (HMM E-Value=0.012) Length = 1115 Score = 29.1 bits (62), Expect = 2.1 Identities = 12/38 (31%), Positives = 20/38 (52%) Query: 7 PGGKTGGGGVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNKDP 44 PG G +A W+ +NR ++E LR A + + + P Sbjct: 552 PGRVEAGRRLAKWNRTNRAKKEALRVAAAQQLPVTPGP 589 >SB_15117| Best HMM Match : Pox_A32 (HMM E-Value=0.038) Length = 771 Score = 29.1 bits (62), Expect = 2.1 Identities = 12/38 (31%), Positives = 20/38 (52%) Query: 7 PGGKTGGGGVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNKDP 44 PG G +A W+ +NR ++E LR A + + + P Sbjct: 404 PGRVEAGRRLAKWNRTNRAKKEALRVAAAQQLPVTPGP 441 >SB_52815| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) Length = 540 Score = 27.9 bits (59), Expect = 4.8 Identities = 10/21 (47%), Positives = 13/21 (61%) Query: 3 FQNRPGGKTGGGGVASWSESN 23 F++ GG GGGG + WS N Sbjct: 203 FKSHKGGAGGGGGSSQWSPEN 223 >SB_17972| Best HMM Match : RnaseH (HMM E-Value=0.95) Length = 186 Score = 27.9 bits (59), Expect = 4.8 Identities = 17/43 (39%), Positives = 24/43 (55%), Gaps = 1/43 (2%) Query: 34 ALETIDLNKDPYFMKNHLEIAEGVIPR-HRFMSAYEQKIEPPD 75 AL+ I +N +F+KN + IA IPR ++ Y KI PD Sbjct: 100 ALQNIAVNIFQFFVKNAVNIAMQWIPRKENELADYISKIVDPD 142 >SB_7014| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) Length = 509 Score = 27.9 bits (59), Expect = 4.8 Identities = 12/38 (31%), Positives = 19/38 (50%) Query: 7 PGGKTGGGGVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNKDP 44 PG G +A W+ NR ++E LR A + + + P Sbjct: 200 PGRVEAGRRLAKWNRINRAKKESLRVAAAQQLPVTPGP 237 >SB_3881| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) Length = 368 Score = 27.9 bits (59), Expect = 4.8 Identities = 12/38 (31%), Positives = 20/38 (52%) Query: 7 PGGKTGGGGVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNKDP 44 PG G +A W+ NR ++E LR A + + + + P Sbjct: 263 PGQVEAGRRLAKWNRINRAKKETLRVAAAQQLPVAQGP 300 >SB_1260| Best HMM Match : Phage_Coat_Gp8 (HMM E-Value=1.3) Length = 220 Score = 27.9 bits (59), Expect = 4.8 Identities = 12/38 (31%), Positives = 19/38 (50%) Query: 7 PGGKTGGGGVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNKDP 44 PG G +A W+ NR ++E LR A + + + P Sbjct: 60 PGRVEAGRRLAKWNRINRAKKEALRVAAAQQLPVTPGP 97 >SB_58633| Best HMM Match : Phage_Coat_Gp8 (HMM E-Value=2.8) Length = 599 Score = 27.9 bits (59), Expect = 4.8 Identities = 12/38 (31%), Positives = 19/38 (50%) Query: 7 PGGKTGGGGVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNKDP 44 PG G +A W+ NR ++E LR A + + + P Sbjct: 443 PGRVEAGRRLAKWNRINRAKKEALRVAAAQQLPVTPGP 480 >SB_52974| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) Length = 660 Score = 27.9 bits (59), Expect = 4.8 Identities = 11/25 (44%), Positives = 15/25 (60%) Query: 7 PGGKTGGGGVASWSESNRDRRERLR 31 PG GG +A W+ NR ++E LR Sbjct: 338 PGRVEAGGRLAKWNRINRAKKETLR 362 >SB_37846| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) Length = 458 Score = 27.9 bits (59), Expect = 4.8 Identities = 12/38 (31%), Positives = 19/38 (50%) Query: 7 PGGKTGGGGVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNKDP 44 PG G +A W+ NR ++E LR A + + + P Sbjct: 302 PGRVEAGRRLAKWNRINRAKKEALRVAAAQQLPVTPGP 339 >SB_32527| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) Length = 62 Score = 27.9 bits (59), Expect = 4.8 Identities = 16/40 (40%), Positives = 20/40 (50%), Gaps = 1/40 (2%) Query: 84 AAEPYETIAFKVPSREVE-KHDSKFWTHWNKDTKQFFLQF 122 A PYE IAFKV +RE E H F + + Q + F Sbjct: 16 AGPPYEDIAFKVVNREWEYSHRHGFRCQFQNNIFQLWFHF 55 >SB_5898| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) Length = 1109 Score = 27.9 bits (59), Expect = 4.8 Identities = 12/38 (31%), Positives = 19/38 (50%) Query: 7 PGGKTGGGGVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNKDP 44 PG G +A W+ NR ++E LR A + + + P Sbjct: 799 PGRVEAGRRLAKWNRINRAKKEALRVAAAQQLPVTPGP 836 >SB_4563| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) Length = 1473 Score = 27.9 bits (59), Expect = 4.8 Identities = 12/38 (31%), Positives = 19/38 (50%) Query: 7 PGGKTGGGGVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNKDP 44 PG G +A W+ NR ++E LR A + + + P Sbjct: 1045 PGRVEAGRRLAKWNRINRAKKEALRVAAAQQLPVTPGP 1082 >SB_53228| Best HMM Match : CITED (HMM E-Value=2.5) Length = 417 Score = 27.5 bits (58), Expect = 6.4 Identities = 12/38 (31%), Positives = 19/38 (50%) Query: 7 PGGKTGGGGVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNKDP 44 PG G +A W+ NR ++E LR A + + + P Sbjct: 186 PGRVEAGRRLAKWNRINRAKKEALRVAAAQQLRVTPGP 223 >SB_48415| Best HMM Match : Pox_A32 (HMM E-Value=0.014) Length = 988 Score = 27.5 bits (58), Expect = 6.4 Identities = 12/38 (31%), Positives = 19/38 (50%) Query: 7 PGGKTGGGGVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNKDP 44 PG G +A W+ NR ++E LR A + + + P Sbjct: 832 PGRVEAGRRLAKWNRINRAKKEALRVAAAQQLPVTLGP 869 >SB_56796| Best HMM Match : CITED (HMM E-Value=1.2) Length = 431 Score = 27.1 bits (57), Expect = 8.4 Identities = 12/38 (31%), Positives = 19/38 (50%) Query: 7 PGGKTGGGGVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNKDP 44 PG G +A W+ NR ++E LR A + + + P Sbjct: 60 PGRVEAGRRLAKWNRINRAKKEVLRVAAAQQLPVTPGP 97 >SB_36409| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) Length = 1281 Score = 27.1 bits (57), Expect = 8.4 Identities = 15/40 (37%), Positives = 21/40 (52%), Gaps = 1/40 (2%) Query: 4 QNRPGGKTGGG-GVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNK 42 + RPGG V S E NR+ R+ +RQ+ E LN+ Sbjct: 425 KERPGGTAESDPNVTSLQEQNRNLRDVIRQMRREMEGLNE 464 >SB_14482| Best HMM Match : Cornifin (HMM E-Value=3.7) Length = 301 Score = 27.1 bits (57), Expect = 8.4 Identities = 12/38 (31%), Positives = 19/38 (50%) Query: 7 PGGKTGGGGVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNKDP 44 PG G +A W+ NR ++E LR A + + + P Sbjct: 57 PGRVEAGRRLAKWNRINRAKKEVLRVAAAQQLPVTPGP 94 >SB_7385| Best HMM Match : DUF1224 (HMM E-Value=5.7) Length = 232 Score = 27.1 bits (57), Expect = 8.4 Identities = 21/87 (24%), Positives = 38/87 (43%), Gaps = 2/87 (2%) Query: 23 NRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNKDPYFMKNHLEIAEGVIPRHRFMSAYEQKIEPPDRRWQYLL 82 +R R+ L+ + ETI L + Y + L+ +P +R M+ + ++ + Y Sbjct: 128 SRSDRKTLK-IYEETIRLREGHYEVAGPLKDGNPGLPNNRPMAEHRLRLLKKKIKQSYSA 186 Query: 83 FAAEPYETI-AFKVPSREVEKHDSKFW 108 + A KVP +E+ D K W Sbjct: 187 SIENLIDKCYAQKVPEEHLEREDGKLW 213 >SB_1330| Best HMM Match : Phage_Coat_Gp8 (HMM E-Value=1.9) Length = 482 Score = 27.1 bits (57), Expect = 8.4 Identities = 12/38 (31%), Positives = 19/38 (50%) Query: 7 PGGKTGGGGVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNKDP 44 PG G +A W+ NR ++E LR A + + + P Sbjct: 126 PGRVEAGRRLAKWNRINRAKKESLRVAAAQQLPVAPGP 163 >SB_1075| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=0.0089) Length = 1617 Score = 27.1 bits (57), Expect = 8.4 Identities = 12/38 (31%), Positives = 19/38 (50%) Query: 7 PGGKTGGGGVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNKDP 44 PG G +A W+ NR ++E LR A + + + P Sbjct: 1148 PGRVEAGRRLAKWNRINRAKKESLRVAAAQQLPVAPGP 1185 >SB_24615| Best HMM Match : CSE2 (HMM E-Value=3.1) Length = 113 Score = 27.1 bits (57), Expect = 8.4 Identities = 15/40 (37%), Positives = 21/40 (52%), Gaps = 1/40 (2%) Query: 4 QNRPGGKTGGG-GVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNK 42 + RPGG V S E NR+ R+ +RQ+ E LN+ Sbjct: 2 KERPGGTAESDPNVTSLQEQNRNLRDVIRQMRREMEGLNE 41 >SB_9870| Best HMM Match : GspM (HMM E-Value=1.9) Length = 522 Score = 27.1 bits (57), Expect = 8.4 Identities = 12/38 (31%), Positives = 19/38 (50%) Query: 7 PGGKTGGGGVASWSESNRDRRERLRQLALETIDLNKDP 44 PG G +A W+ NR ++E LR A + + + P Sbjct: 195 PGRVEAGRRLAKWNRINRAKKEVLRVAAAQQLPVTPGP 232 Database: nematostella Posted date: Oct 22, 2007 1:22 PM Number of letters in database: 16,821,457 Number of sequences in database: 59,808 Lambda K H 0.321 0.136 0.439 Gapped Lambda K H 0.279 0.0580 0.190 Matrix: BLOSUM62 Gap Penalties: Existence: 9, Extension: 2 Number of Hits to DB: 5,803,619 Number of Sequences: 59808 Number of extensions: 229432 Number of successful extensions: 513 Number of sequences better than 10.0: 25 Number of HSP's better than 10.0 without gapping: 20 Number of HSP's successfully gapped in prelim test: 5 Number of HSP's that attempted gapping in prelim test: 493 Number of HSP's gapped (non-prelim): 25 length of query: 173 length of database: 16,821,457 effective HSP length: 77 effective length of query: 96 effective length of database: 12,216,241 effective search space: 1172759136 effective search space used: 1172759136 T: 11 A: 40 X1: 16 ( 7.4 bits) X2: 37 (14.9 bits) X3: 62 (25.0 bits) S1: 41 (21.9 bits) S2: 57 (27.1 bits)
- SilkBase 1999-2023 -