SilkBase IMG001 IMG002 IMG003 IMG005 IMG006 IMG007 IMG008 IMG009 kuwako IMG010 IMG011 IMG012

Last updated: 2022/11/18
BLASTX 2.2.12 [Aug-07-2005]


Reference: Altschul, Stephen F., Thomas L. Madden, Alejandro A. Schaffer, 
Jinghui Zhang, Zheng Zhang, Webb Miller, and David J. Lipman (1997), 
"Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search
programs",  Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-3402.

Query= msgV0198.Seq
         (508 letters)

Database: nematostella 
           59,808 sequences; 16,821,457 total letters

Searching..................................................done

                                                                 Score    E
Sequences producing significant alignments:                      (bits) Value

SB_8108| Best HMM Match : GST_N (HMM E-Value=3.9e-14)                  48   6e-06
SB_56665| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=8.6e-16)                   31   0.41 
SB_26190| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=3.1e-26)                   31   0.41 
SB_26129| Best HMM Match : RVT_1 (HMM E-Value=1.2e-27)                 31   0.41 
SB_15856| Best HMM Match : RVT_1 (HMM E-Value=1.3e-27)                 31   0.41 
SB_4788| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=0)                          31   0.41 
SB_952| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=9.4e-26)                     31   0.41 
SB_52367| Best HMM Match : RnaseH (HMM E-Value=0.53)                   31   0.41 
SB_46362| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=3e-26)                     31   0.41 
SB_46104| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=1.4e-10)                   31   0.41 
SB_45058| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=2.6e-05)                   31   0.41 
SB_42299| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.)              31   0.41 
SB_39172| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.)              31   0.41 
SB_11157| Best HMM Match : NUC173 (HMM E-Value=9.2e-39)                31   0.41 
SB_7494| Best HMM Match : RVT_1 (HMM E-Value=4.6e-28)                  31   0.41 
SB_3577| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.)               31   0.41 
SB_24| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.)                 31   0.41 
SB_39850| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.)              30   0.95 

>SB_8108| Best HMM Match : GST_N (HMM E-Value=3.9e-14)
          Length = 238

 Score = 47.6 bits (108), Expect = 6e-06
 Identities = 21/60 (35%), Positives = 33/60 (55%)
 Frame = -1

Query: 430 LEIFEKELTNRGTNYFGGNRPGMLDYMVWPWVERLYLLRCVNDRKFVEKKSLFPNFADWV 251
           L ++E EL N+   +F G +PGM D+M+WP+ ER     C+ + K+      FP    W+
Sbjct: 147 LSLYENELKNK--TFFAGEKPGMADFMLWPFFERF----CLLEGKYEISAKSFPALTKWI 200


>SB_56665| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=8.6e-16)
          Length = 608

 Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41
 Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%)
 Frame = -2

Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241
           G + WT  + LG  G  S  V T   ++RRNR  LIS TG +N+
Sbjct: 516 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 558


>SB_26190| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=3.1e-26)
          Length = 316

 Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41
 Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%)
 Frame = -2

Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241
           G + WT  + LG  G  S  V T   ++RRNR  LIS TG +N+
Sbjct: 237 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 279


>SB_26129| Best HMM Match : RVT_1 (HMM E-Value=1.2e-27)
          Length = 1036

 Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41
 Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%)
 Frame = -2

Query: 372  GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241
            G + WT  + LG  G  S  V T   ++RRNR  LIS TG +N+
Sbjct: 957  GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 999


>SB_15856| Best HMM Match : RVT_1 (HMM E-Value=1.3e-27)
          Length = 514

 Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41
 Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%)
 Frame = -2

Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241
           G + WT  + LG  G  S  V T   ++RRNR  LIS TG +N+
Sbjct: 422 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 464


>SB_4788| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=0)
          Length = 1125

 Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41
 Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%)
 Frame = -2

Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241
           G + WT  + LG  G  S  V T   ++RRNR  LIS TG +N+
Sbjct: 483 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 525



 Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41
 Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%)
 Frame = -2

Query: 372  GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241
            G + WT  + LG  G  S  V T   ++RRNR  LIS TG +N+
Sbjct: 1033 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 1075


>SB_952| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=9.4e-26)
          Length = 455

 Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41
 Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%)
 Frame = -2

Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241
           G + WT  + LG  G  S  V T   ++RRNR  LIS TG +N+
Sbjct: 363 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 405


>SB_52367| Best HMM Match : RnaseH (HMM E-Value=0.53)
          Length = 325

 Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41
 Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%)
 Frame = -2

Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241
           G + WT  + LG  G  S  V T   ++RRNR  LIS TG +N+
Sbjct: 233 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 275


>SB_46362| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=3e-26)
          Length = 455

 Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41
 Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%)
 Frame = -2

Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241
           G + WT  + LG  G  S  V T   ++RRNR  LIS TG +N+
Sbjct: 363 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 405


>SB_46104| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=1.4e-10)
          Length = 263

 Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41
 Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%)
 Frame = -2

Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241
           G + WT  + LG  G  S  V T   ++RRNR  LIS TG +N+
Sbjct: 184 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 226


>SB_45058| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=2.6e-05)
          Length = 272

 Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41
 Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%)
 Frame = -2

Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241
           G + WT  + LG  G  S  V T   ++RRNR  LIS TG +N+
Sbjct: 180 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 222


>SB_42299| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.)
          Length = 226

 Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41
 Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%)
 Frame = -2

Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241
           G + WT  + LG  G  S  V T   ++RRNR  LIS TG +N+
Sbjct: 147 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 189


>SB_39172| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.)
          Length = 244

 Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41
 Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%)
 Frame = -2

Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241
           G + WT  + LG  G  S  V T   ++RRNR  LIS TG +N+
Sbjct: 182 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 224


>SB_11157| Best HMM Match : NUC173 (HMM E-Value=9.2e-39)
          Length = 1060

 Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41
 Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%)
 Frame = -2

Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241
           G + WT  + LG  G  S  V T   ++RRNR  LIS TG +N+
Sbjct: 237 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 279


>SB_7494| Best HMM Match : RVT_1 (HMM E-Value=4.6e-28)
          Length = 960

 Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41
 Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%)
 Frame = -2

Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241
           G + WT  + LG  G  S  V T   ++RRNR  LIS TG +N+
Sbjct: 868 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 910


>SB_3577| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.)
          Length = 1164

 Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41
 Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%)
 Frame = -2

Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241
           G + WT  + LG  G  S  V T   ++RRNR  LIS TG +N+
Sbjct: 677 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 719


>SB_24| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.)
          Length = 1246

 Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41
 Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%)
 Frame = -2

Query: 372  GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241
            G + WT  + LG  G  S  V T   ++RRNR  LIS TG +N+
Sbjct: 1076 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 1118


>SB_39850| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.)
          Length = 203

 Score = 30.3 bits (65), Expect = 0.95
 Identities = 18/44 (40%), Positives = 25/44 (56%)
 Frame = -2

Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241
           G + WT  + LG  G  S  V T   ++RRNR  +IS TG +N+
Sbjct: 124 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQVIS-TGETNS 166


  Database: nematostella
    Posted date:  Oct 22, 2007  1:22 PM
  Number of letters in database: 16,821,457
  Number of sequences in database:  59,808
  
Lambda     K      H
   0.318    0.134    0.401 

Gapped
Lambda     K      H
   0.279   0.0580    0.190 


Matrix: BLOSUM62
Gap Penalties: Existence: 9, Extension: 2
Number of Hits to DB: 14,880,560
Number of Sequences: 59808
Number of extensions: 294205
Number of successful extensions: 670
Number of sequences better than 10.0: 18
Number of HSP's better than 10.0 without gapping: 619
Number of HSP's successfully gapped in prelim test: 0
Number of HSP's that attempted gapping in prelim test: 0
Number of HSP's gapped (non-prelim): 668
length of database: 16,821,457
effective HSP length: 77
effective length of database: 12,216,241
effective search space used: 1111677931
frameshift window, decay const: 40,  0.1
T: 12
A: 40
X1: 16 ( 7.3 bits)
X2: 37 (14.9 bits)
X3: 62 (25.0 bits)
S1: 41 (21.7 bits)

- SilkBase 1999-2023 -