BLASTX 2.2.12 [Aug-07-2005] Reference: Altschul, Stephen F., Thomas L. Madden, Alejandro A. Schaffer, Jinghui Zhang, Zheng Zhang, Webb Miller, and David J. Lipman (1997), "Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs", Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-3402. Query= msgV0198.Seq (508 letters) Database: nematostella 59,808 sequences; 16,821,457 total letters Searching..................................................done Score E Sequences producing significant alignments: (bits) Value SB_8108| Best HMM Match : GST_N (HMM E-Value=3.9e-14) 48 6e-06 SB_56665| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=8.6e-16) 31 0.41 SB_26190| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=3.1e-26) 31 0.41 SB_26129| Best HMM Match : RVT_1 (HMM E-Value=1.2e-27) 31 0.41 SB_15856| Best HMM Match : RVT_1 (HMM E-Value=1.3e-27) 31 0.41 SB_4788| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=0) 31 0.41 SB_952| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=9.4e-26) 31 0.41 SB_52367| Best HMM Match : RnaseH (HMM E-Value=0.53) 31 0.41 SB_46362| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=3e-26) 31 0.41 SB_46104| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=1.4e-10) 31 0.41 SB_45058| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=2.6e-05) 31 0.41 SB_42299| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 31 0.41 SB_39172| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 31 0.41 SB_11157| Best HMM Match : NUC173 (HMM E-Value=9.2e-39) 31 0.41 SB_7494| Best HMM Match : RVT_1 (HMM E-Value=4.6e-28) 31 0.41 SB_3577| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 31 0.41 SB_24| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 31 0.41 SB_39850| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 30 0.95 >SB_8108| Best HMM Match : GST_N (HMM E-Value=3.9e-14) Length = 238 Score = 47.6 bits (108), Expect = 6e-06 Identities = 21/60 (35%), Positives = 33/60 (55%) Frame = -1 Query: 430 LEIFEKELTNRGTNYFGGNRPGMLDYMVWPWVERLYLLRCVNDRKFVEKKSLFPNFADWV 251 L ++E EL N+ +F G +PGM D+M+WP+ ER C+ + K+ FP W+ Sbjct: 147 LSLYENELKNK--TFFAGEKPGMADFMLWPFFERF----CLLEGKYEISAKSFPALTKWI 200 >SB_56665| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=8.6e-16) Length = 608 Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41 Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%) Frame = -2 Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241 G + WT + LG G S V T ++RRNR LIS TG +N+ Sbjct: 516 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 558 >SB_26190| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=3.1e-26) Length = 316 Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41 Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%) Frame = -2 Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241 G + WT + LG G S V T ++RRNR LIS TG +N+ Sbjct: 237 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 279 >SB_26129| Best HMM Match : RVT_1 (HMM E-Value=1.2e-27) Length = 1036 Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41 Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%) Frame = -2 Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241 G + WT + LG G S V T ++RRNR LIS TG +N+ Sbjct: 957 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 999 >SB_15856| Best HMM Match : RVT_1 (HMM E-Value=1.3e-27) Length = 514 Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41 Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%) Frame = -2 Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241 G + WT + LG G S V T ++RRNR LIS TG +N+ Sbjct: 422 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 464 >SB_4788| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=0) Length = 1125 Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41 Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%) Frame = -2 Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241 G + WT + LG G S V T ++RRNR LIS TG +N+ Sbjct: 483 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 525 Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41 Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%) Frame = -2 Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241 G + WT + LG G S V T ++RRNR LIS TG +N+ Sbjct: 1033 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 1075 >SB_952| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=9.4e-26) Length = 455 Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41 Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%) Frame = -2 Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241 G + WT + LG G S V T ++RRNR LIS TG +N+ Sbjct: 363 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 405 >SB_52367| Best HMM Match : RnaseH (HMM E-Value=0.53) Length = 325 Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41 Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%) Frame = -2 Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241 G + WT + LG G S V T ++RRNR LIS TG +N+ Sbjct: 233 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 275 >SB_46362| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=3e-26) Length = 455 Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41 Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%) Frame = -2 Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241 G + WT + LG G S V T ++RRNR LIS TG +N+ Sbjct: 363 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 405 >SB_46104| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=1.4e-10) Length = 263 Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41 Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%) Frame = -2 Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241 G + WT + LG G S V T ++RRNR LIS TG +N+ Sbjct: 184 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 226 >SB_45058| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=2.6e-05) Length = 272 Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41 Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%) Frame = -2 Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241 G + WT + LG G S V T ++RRNR LIS TG +N+ Sbjct: 180 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 222 >SB_42299| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) Length = 226 Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41 Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%) Frame = -2 Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241 G + WT + LG G S V T ++RRNR LIS TG +N+ Sbjct: 147 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 189 >SB_39172| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) Length = 244 Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41 Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%) Frame = -2 Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241 G + WT + LG G S V T ++RRNR LIS TG +N+ Sbjct: 182 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 224 >SB_11157| Best HMM Match : NUC173 (HMM E-Value=9.2e-39) Length = 1060 Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41 Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%) Frame = -2 Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241 G + WT + LG G S V T ++RRNR LIS TG +N+ Sbjct: 237 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 279 >SB_7494| Best HMM Match : RVT_1 (HMM E-Value=4.6e-28) Length = 960 Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41 Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%) Frame = -2 Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241 G + WT + LG G S V T ++RRNR LIS TG +N+ Sbjct: 868 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 910 >SB_3577| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) Length = 1164 Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41 Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%) Frame = -2 Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241 G + WT + LG G S V T ++RRNR LIS TG +N+ Sbjct: 677 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 719 >SB_24| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) Length = 1246 Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41 Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%) Frame = -2 Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241 G + WT + LG G S V T ++RRNR LIS TG +N+ Sbjct: 1076 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 1118 >SB_39850| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) Length = 203 Score = 30.3 bits (65), Expect = 0.95 Identities = 18/44 (40%), Positives = 25/44 (56%) Frame = -2 Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241 G + WT + LG G S V T ++RRNR +IS TG +N+ Sbjct: 124 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQVIS-TGETNS 166 Database: nematostella Posted date: Oct 22, 2007 1:22 PM Number of letters in database: 16,821,457 Number of sequences in database: 59,808 Lambda K H 0.318 0.134 0.401 Gapped Lambda K H 0.279 0.0580 0.190 Matrix: BLOSUM62 Gap Penalties: Existence: 9, Extension: 2 Number of Hits to DB: 14,880,560 Number of Sequences: 59808 Number of extensions: 294205 Number of successful extensions: 670 Number of sequences better than 10.0: 18 Number of HSP's better than 10.0 without gapping: 619 Number of HSP's successfully gapped in prelim test: 0 Number of HSP's that attempted gapping in prelim test: 0 Number of HSP's gapped (non-prelim): 668 length of database: 16,821,457 effective HSP length: 77 effective length of database: 12,216,241 effective search space used: 1111677931 frameshift window, decay const: 40, 0.1 T: 12 A: 40 X1: 16 ( 7.3 bits) X2: 37 (14.9 bits) X3: 62 (25.0 bits) S1: 41 (21.7 bits)
- SilkBase 1999-2023 -