BLASTX 2.2.12 [Aug-07-2005]
Reference: Altschul, Stephen F., Thomas L. Madden, Alejandro A. Schaffer,
Jinghui Zhang, Zheng Zhang, Webb Miller, and David J. Lipman (1997),
"Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search
programs", Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-3402.
Query= msgV0198.Seq
(508 letters)
Database: nematostella
59,808 sequences; 16,821,457 total letters
Searching..................................................done
Score E
Sequences producing significant alignments: (bits) Value
SB_8108| Best HMM Match : GST_N (HMM E-Value=3.9e-14) 48 6e-06
SB_56665| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=8.6e-16) 31 0.41
SB_26190| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=3.1e-26) 31 0.41
SB_26129| Best HMM Match : RVT_1 (HMM E-Value=1.2e-27) 31 0.41
SB_15856| Best HMM Match : RVT_1 (HMM E-Value=1.3e-27) 31 0.41
SB_4788| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=0) 31 0.41
SB_952| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=9.4e-26) 31 0.41
SB_52367| Best HMM Match : RnaseH (HMM E-Value=0.53) 31 0.41
SB_46362| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=3e-26) 31 0.41
SB_46104| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=1.4e-10) 31 0.41
SB_45058| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=2.6e-05) 31 0.41
SB_42299| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 31 0.41
SB_39172| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 31 0.41
SB_11157| Best HMM Match : NUC173 (HMM E-Value=9.2e-39) 31 0.41
SB_7494| Best HMM Match : RVT_1 (HMM E-Value=4.6e-28) 31 0.41
SB_3577| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 31 0.41
SB_24| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 31 0.41
SB_39850| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 30 0.95
>SB_8108| Best HMM Match : GST_N (HMM E-Value=3.9e-14)
Length = 238
Score = 47.6 bits (108), Expect = 6e-06
Identities = 21/60 (35%), Positives = 33/60 (55%)
Frame = -1
Query: 430 LEIFEKELTNRGTNYFGGNRPGMLDYMVWPWVERLYLLRCVNDRKFVEKKSLFPNFADWV 251
L ++E EL N+ +F G +PGM D+M+WP+ ER C+ + K+ FP W+
Sbjct: 147 LSLYENELKNK--TFFAGEKPGMADFMLWPFFERF----CLLEGKYEISAKSFPALTKWI 200
>SB_56665| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=8.6e-16)
Length = 608
Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41
Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%)
Frame = -2
Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241
G + WT + LG G S V T ++RRNR LIS TG +N+
Sbjct: 516 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 558
>SB_26190| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=3.1e-26)
Length = 316
Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41
Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%)
Frame = -2
Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241
G + WT + LG G S V T ++RRNR LIS TG +N+
Sbjct: 237 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 279
>SB_26129| Best HMM Match : RVT_1 (HMM E-Value=1.2e-27)
Length = 1036
Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41
Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%)
Frame = -2
Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241
G + WT + LG G S V T ++RRNR LIS TG +N+
Sbjct: 957 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 999
>SB_15856| Best HMM Match : RVT_1 (HMM E-Value=1.3e-27)
Length = 514
Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41
Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%)
Frame = -2
Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241
G + WT + LG G S V T ++RRNR LIS TG +N+
Sbjct: 422 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 464
>SB_4788| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=0)
Length = 1125
Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41
Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%)
Frame = -2
Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241
G + WT + LG G S V T ++RRNR LIS TG +N+
Sbjct: 483 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 525
Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41
Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%)
Frame = -2
Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241
G + WT + LG G S V T ++RRNR LIS TG +N+
Sbjct: 1033 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 1075
>SB_952| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=9.4e-26)
Length = 455
Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41
Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%)
Frame = -2
Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241
G + WT + LG G S V T ++RRNR LIS TG +N+
Sbjct: 363 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 405
>SB_52367| Best HMM Match : RnaseH (HMM E-Value=0.53)
Length = 325
Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41
Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%)
Frame = -2
Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241
G + WT + LG G S V T ++RRNR LIS TG +N+
Sbjct: 233 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 275
>SB_46362| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=3e-26)
Length = 455
Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41
Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%)
Frame = -2
Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241
G + WT + LG G S V T ++RRNR LIS TG +N+
Sbjct: 363 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 405
>SB_46104| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=1.4e-10)
Length = 263
Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41
Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%)
Frame = -2
Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241
G + WT + LG G S V T ++RRNR LIS TG +N+
Sbjct: 184 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 226
>SB_45058| Best HMM Match : rve (HMM E-Value=2.6e-05)
Length = 272
Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41
Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%)
Frame = -2
Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241
G + WT + LG G S V T ++RRNR LIS TG +N+
Sbjct: 180 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 222
>SB_42299| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.)
Length = 226
Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41
Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%)
Frame = -2
Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241
G + WT + LG G S V T ++RRNR LIS TG +N+
Sbjct: 147 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 189
>SB_39172| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.)
Length = 244
Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41
Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%)
Frame = -2
Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241
G + WT + LG G S V T ++RRNR LIS TG +N+
Sbjct: 182 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 224
>SB_11157| Best HMM Match : NUC173 (HMM E-Value=9.2e-39)
Length = 1060
Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41
Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%)
Frame = -2
Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241
G + WT + LG G S V T ++RRNR LIS TG +N+
Sbjct: 237 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 279
>SB_7494| Best HMM Match : RVT_1 (HMM E-Value=4.6e-28)
Length = 960
Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41
Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%)
Frame = -2
Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241
G + WT + LG G S V T ++RRNR LIS TG +N+
Sbjct: 868 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 910
>SB_3577| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.)
Length = 1164
Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41
Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%)
Frame = -2
Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241
G + WT + LG G S V T ++RRNR LIS TG +N+
Sbjct: 677 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 719
>SB_24| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.)
Length = 1246
Score = 31.5 bits (68), Expect = 0.41
Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 25/44 (56%)
Frame = -2
Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241
G + WT + LG G S V T ++RRNR LIS TG +N+
Sbjct: 1076 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQLIS-TGETNS 1118
>SB_39850| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.)
Length = 203
Score = 30.3 bits (65), Expect = 0.95
Identities = 18/44 (40%), Positives = 25/44 (56%)
Frame = -2
Query: 372 GLECWTTWSGLGSRGCTS*GVSTIENSWRRNRFSLISRTG*SNA 241
G + WT + LG G S V T ++RRNR +IS TG +N+
Sbjct: 124 GQDTWTPGTCLGQAGPRSYNVETEGTTYRRNRRQVIS-TGETNS 166
Database: nematostella
Posted date: Oct 22, 2007 1:22 PM
Number of letters in database: 16,821,457
Number of sequences in database: 59,808
Lambda K H
0.318 0.134 0.401
Gapped
Lambda K H
0.279 0.0580 0.190
Matrix: BLOSUM62
Gap Penalties: Existence: 9, Extension: 2
Number of Hits to DB: 14,880,560
Number of Sequences: 59808
Number of extensions: 294205
Number of successful extensions: 670
Number of sequences better than 10.0: 18
Number of HSP's better than 10.0 without gapping: 619
Number of HSP's successfully gapped in prelim test: 0
Number of HSP's that attempted gapping in prelim test: 0
Number of HSP's gapped (non-prelim): 668
length of database: 16,821,457
effective HSP length: 77
effective length of database: 12,216,241
effective search space used: 1111677931
frameshift window, decay const: 40, 0.1
T: 12
A: 40
X1: 16 ( 7.3 bits)
X2: 37 (14.9 bits)
X3: 62 (25.0 bits)
S1: 41 (21.7 bits)
- SilkBase 1999-2023 -