BLASTX 2.2.12 [Aug-07-2005] Reference: Altschul, Stephen F., Thomas L. Madden, Alejandro A. Schaffer, Jinghui Zhang, Zheng Zhang, Webb Miller, and David J. Lipman (1997), "Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs", Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-3402. Query= FWDP01_FL5_O12 (839 letters) Database: nematostella 59,808 sequences; 16,821,457 total letters Searching..................................................done Score E Sequences producing significant alignments: (bits) Value SB_29559| Best HMM Match : zf-CCHC (HMM E-Value=0.0015) 30 2.0 SB_7937| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 29 3.6 SB_57183| Best HMM Match : 7tm_1 (HMM E-Value=3.1e-08) 29 6.2 SB_34376| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 29 6.2 SB_24607| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 29 6.2 SB_56618| Best HMM Match : DUF1213 (HMM E-Value=0.022) 28 8.2 SB_50872| Best HMM Match : AraC_E_bind (HMM E-Value=7.5) 28 8.2 SB_40188| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 28 8.2 SB_30951| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 28 8.2 SB_19415| Best HMM Match : LON (HMM E-Value=4.4) 28 8.2 SB_15450| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 28 8.2 SB_12645| Best HMM Match : Laminin_EGF (HMM E-Value=3e-31) 28 8.2 SB_12578| Best HMM Match : DUF488 (HMM E-Value=9.4) 28 8.2 SB_10577| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 28 8.2 SB_54734| Best HMM Match : RVT_1 (HMM E-Value=0.24) 28 8.2 SB_41518| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) 28 8.2 SB_40322| Best HMM Match : RVT_1 (HMM E-Value=7.4e-27) 28 8.2 SB_35035| Best HMM Match : Mic1 (HMM E-Value=5.3) 28 8.2 SB_32313| Best HMM Match : RnaseH (HMM E-Value=2.5) 28 8.2 SB_9947| Best HMM Match : Exo_endo_phos (HMM E-Value=1.2) 28 8.2 >SB_29559| Best HMM Match : zf-CCHC (HMM E-Value=0.0015) Length = 858 Score = 30.3 bits (65), Expect = 2.0 Identities = 15/42 (35%), Positives = 20/42 (47%) Frame = +1 Query: 7 HGPGRAPPDGCPPRDQEASAIRGRGDRSSVPRPQTGRSVELP 132 HG G A P R + A RG + + VP+ T V+LP Sbjct: 44 HGHGHAHPQNSGERKSYSQAARGHQNTTEVPQDFTTARVDLP 85 >SB_7937| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) Length = 618 Score = 29.5 bits (63), Expect = 3.6 Identities = 14/32 (43%), Positives = 16/32 (50%) Frame = +1 Query: 10 GPGRAPPDGCPPRDQEASAIRGRGDRSSVPRP 105 GPG PP G PP++ RG G PRP Sbjct: 378 GPG-FPPRGMPPKEDWGPGPRGMGPGMGPPRP 408 >SB_57183| Best HMM Match : 7tm_1 (HMM E-Value=3.1e-08) Length = 533 Score = 28.7 bits (61), Expect = 6.2 Identities = 20/71 (28%), Positives = 32/71 (45%), Gaps = 1/71 (1%) Frame = +2 Query: 50 IRRRPRSGVGVTGLRYLGLKLDGRWNFRAHFEKLGPRADGNGRLFEPAPSKRR-GSRSGG 226 + RRP + G G R+ D R ++R + + PRA R+ S+ + GSR G Sbjct: 308 MERRPEAAPGYPGSRHSSRHEDERDSYRGSRDPVIPRAGSRDRVPSYHGSREKMGSRQGS 367 Query: 227 APPLHGGGAVD 259 + G+ D Sbjct: 368 RQEMPRYGSRD 378 >SB_34376| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) Length = 150 Score = 28.7 bits (61), Expect = 6.2 Identities = 13/35 (37%), Positives = 19/35 (54%) Frame = +3 Query: 186 SRLLPNVGGPDQVARRLYMGVVRSMALYGAPVWCH 290 +RLL G P Q +Y ++RS+ Y PVW + Sbjct: 14 NRLLKKSGVPVQDLVAIYCVLIRSVVEYAGPVWAN 48 >SB_24607| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) Length = 150 Score = 28.7 bits (61), Expect = 6.2 Identities = 13/35 (37%), Positives = 19/35 (54%) Frame = +3 Query: 186 SRLLPNVGGPDQVARRLYMGVVRSMALYGAPVWCH 290 +RLL G P Q +Y ++RS+ Y PVW + Sbjct: 14 NRLLKKSGVPVQDLVAIYCVLIRSVVEYAGPVWAN 48 >SB_56618| Best HMM Match : DUF1213 (HMM E-Value=0.022) Length = 1421 Score = 28.3 bits (60), Expect = 8.2 Identities = 13/37 (35%), Positives = 17/37 (45%) Frame = -3 Query: 561 SVRPRLQHGPPRLEPPRSNXSFAGAPFPPRAEVXTPP 451 S RPR PP E PR+N PP+ + + P Sbjct: 218 SFRPRTAPLPPAPESPRANPRITSGRAPPKRPLGSTP 254 >SB_50872| Best HMM Match : AraC_E_bind (HMM E-Value=7.5) Length = 206 Score = 28.3 bits (60), Expect = 8.2 Identities = 13/34 (38%), Positives = 18/34 (52%) Frame = +3 Query: 189 RLLPNVGGPDQVARRLYMGVVRSMALYGAPVWCH 290 RLL G P Q +Y ++RS+ Y PVW + Sbjct: 71 RLLKKSGVPVQDLVAIYCVLIRSVVEYAGPVWAN 104 >SB_40188| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) Length = 232 Score = 28.3 bits (60), Expect = 8.2 Identities = 13/34 (38%), Positives = 18/34 (52%) Frame = +3 Query: 189 RLLPNVGGPDQVARRLYMGVVRSMALYGAPVWCH 290 RLL G P Q +Y ++RS+ Y PVW + Sbjct: 97 RLLKKSGVPVQDLIAIYCVLIRSVGEYAGPVWAN 130 >SB_30951| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) Length = 206 Score = 28.3 bits (60), Expect = 8.2 Identities = 13/34 (38%), Positives = 18/34 (52%) Frame = +3 Query: 189 RLLPNVGGPDQVARRLYMGVVRSMALYGAPVWCH 290 RLL G P Q +Y ++RS+ Y PVW + Sbjct: 71 RLLKKSGVPVQDLIAIYCVLIRSVVEYAGPVWAN 104 >SB_19415| Best HMM Match : LON (HMM E-Value=4.4) Length = 360 Score = 28.3 bits (60), Expect = 8.2 Identities = 13/30 (43%), Positives = 18/30 (60%) Frame = +3 Query: 195 LPNVGGPDQVARRLYMGVVRSMALYGAPVW 284 +P V D V R+Y ++RS+ Y APVW Sbjct: 230 IPGVQSNDLV--RIYYALIRSVLEYAAPVW 257 >SB_15450| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) Length = 206 Score = 28.3 bits (60), Expect = 8.2 Identities = 13/34 (38%), Positives = 18/34 (52%) Frame = +3 Query: 189 RLLPNVGGPDQVARRLYMGVVRSMALYGAPVWCH 290 RLL G P Q +Y ++RS+ Y PVW + Sbjct: 71 RLLKKSGVPVQDLVAIYCVLIRSVVEYAGPVWAN 104 >SB_12645| Best HMM Match : Laminin_EGF (HMM E-Value=3e-31) Length = 541 Score = 28.3 bits (60), Expect = 8.2 Identities = 13/34 (38%), Positives = 18/34 (52%) Frame = +3 Query: 189 RLLPNVGGPDQVARRLYMGVVRSMALYGAPVWCH 290 RLL G P Q +Y ++RS+ Y PVW + Sbjct: 286 RLLKKSGVPVQDLVAIYCVLIRSVVEYAGPVWAN 319 >SB_12578| Best HMM Match : DUF488 (HMM E-Value=9.4) Length = 249 Score = 28.3 bits (60), Expect = 8.2 Identities = 13/34 (38%), Positives = 18/34 (52%) Frame = +3 Query: 189 RLLPNVGGPDQVARRLYMGVVRSMALYGAPVWCH 290 RLL G P Q +Y ++RS+ Y PVW + Sbjct: 114 RLLKKSGVPVQDLVAIYCVLIRSVVEYAGPVWAN 147 >SB_10577| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) Length = 178 Score = 28.3 bits (60), Expect = 8.2 Identities = 13/34 (38%), Positives = 18/34 (52%) Frame = +3 Query: 189 RLLPNVGGPDQVARRLYMGVVRSMALYGAPVWCH 290 RLL G P Q +Y ++RS+ Y PVW + Sbjct: 43 RLLKKSGVPVQDLIAIYCVLIRSVVEYAGPVWAN 76 >SB_54734| Best HMM Match : RVT_1 (HMM E-Value=0.24) Length = 299 Score = 28.3 bits (60), Expect = 8.2 Identities = 13/34 (38%), Positives = 18/34 (52%) Frame = +3 Query: 189 RLLPNVGGPDQVARRLYMGVVRSMALYGAPVWCH 290 RLL G P Q +Y ++RS+ Y PVW + Sbjct: 205 RLLKKSGVPVQDLIAIYCVLIRSVVEYAGPVWAN 238 >SB_41518| Best HMM Match : No HMM Matches (HMM E-Value=.) Length = 251 Score = 28.3 bits (60), Expect = 8.2 Identities = 13/34 (38%), Positives = 18/34 (52%) Frame = +3 Query: 189 RLLPNVGGPDQVARRLYMGVVRSMALYGAPVWCH 290 RLL G P Q +Y ++RS+ Y PVW + Sbjct: 116 RLLKKSGVPVQDLIAIYCVLIRSVVEYAGPVWAN 149 >SB_40322| Best HMM Match : RVT_1 (HMM E-Value=7.4e-27) Length = 710 Score = 28.3 bits (60), Expect = 8.2 Identities = 13/34 (38%), Positives = 18/34 (52%) Frame = +3 Query: 189 RLLPNVGGPDQVARRLYMGVVRSMALYGAPVWCH 290 RLL G P Q +Y ++RS+ Y PVW + Sbjct: 628 RLLKKSGVPVQDLVAIYCVLIRSVVEYAGPVWAN 661 >SB_35035| Best HMM Match : Mic1 (HMM E-Value=5.3) Length = 235 Score = 28.3 bits (60), Expect = 8.2 Identities = 13/34 (38%), Positives = 18/34 (52%) Frame = +3 Query: 189 RLLPNVGGPDQVARRLYMGVVRSMALYGAPVWCH 290 RLL G P Q +Y ++RS+ Y PVW + Sbjct: 100 RLLKKSGVPVQDLIAIYCVLIRSVVEYAGPVWAN 133 >SB_32313| Best HMM Match : RnaseH (HMM E-Value=2.5) Length = 721 Score = 28.3 bits (60), Expect = 8.2 Identities = 13/34 (38%), Positives = 18/34 (52%) Frame = +3 Query: 189 RLLPNVGGPDQVARRLYMGVVRSMALYGAPVWCH 290 RLL G P Q +Y ++RS+ Y PVW + Sbjct: 594 RLLKKSGVPVQDLVAIYCVLIRSVVEYAGPVWAN 627 >SB_9947| Best HMM Match : Exo_endo_phos (HMM E-Value=1.2) Length = 405 Score = 28.3 bits (60), Expect = 8.2 Identities = 13/34 (38%), Positives = 18/34 (52%) Frame = +3 Query: 189 RLLPNVGGPDQVARRLYMGVVRSMALYGAPVWCH 290 RLL G P Q +Y ++RS+ Y PVW + Sbjct: 270 RLLKKSGVPVQDLIAIYCVLIRSVVEYAGPVWAN 303 Database: nematostella Posted date: Oct 22, 2007 1:22 PM Number of letters in database: 16,821,457 Number of sequences in database: 59,808 Lambda K H 0.318 0.134 0.401 Gapped Lambda K H 0.279 0.0580 0.190 Matrix: BLOSUM62 Gap Penalties: Existence: 9, Extension: 2 Number of Hits to DB: 18,463,277 Number of Sequences: 59808 Number of extensions: 388608 Number of successful extensions: 1612 Number of sequences better than 10.0: 20 Number of HSP's better than 10.0 without gapping: 1441 Number of HSP's successfully gapped in prelim test: 0 Number of HSP's that attempted gapping in prelim test: 0 Number of HSP's gapped (non-prelim): 1609 length of database: 16,821,457 effective HSP length: 81 effective length of database: 11,977,009 effective search space used: 2371447782 frameshift window, decay const: 40, 0.1 T: 12 A: 40 X1: 16 ( 7.3 bits) X2: 37 (14.9 bits) X3: 62 (25.0 bits) S1: 41 (21.7 bits)
- SilkBase 1999-2023 -